Fraudulent listing of SLP (Civil) against an ageing scholarly person to usurp his entire property . SLP (Civil) No.8140 of 2017 to be heard on 6th July 2018 is total fraud played on court by three lawyers. One from Delhi, one from Aurangabd and one from Nanded
The legal principle behind listing and hearing of appeals is that Supreme Court must list only those special Leave petitions in which a substantial question of law is raised by the petitioner which was ignored by the High Court. In Special Leave Petition No.8140 of 2017 has been listed fraudulently by the petitioner and his lawyer with the aid of someone in the registry. Petitioner has filed an unregistered homemade document which is not a will and which is above the value of Rs. One hundred.
According to section 17 of The Registration Act 1908 document meant to transfer property of the value above Rs. One hundred should be compulsorily registered in sub registrar’s office (Suraj Lamps and Industries v. State of Harayana 2011) How can listing be done when the property document seeking validation is not a registered document and it is homemade ? Besides the certified copy of disputed document is not filed in Supreme Court by the petitioners, but a retyped altered cut and paste copy has been filed. The crux of the falsehood is that original document seeking transfer of property has been typed on Godrej Prima typewriter allegedly in 1985 when Godrej Prima did not exist in 1985.
As per the archives “Making the Indian Typewriter: Godrej Story” the typewriter Godrej Prima was developed in 1988 and marketed widely after 1989. Second falsehood is that the stamp paper was not purchased by one of the executants but was purchased by a stranger by name one Mazamat Ali s/o Mohammed Bashir and was re- purchased by petitioners in black market. Additional name of second purchaser G.B.Enterprises does not appear in stamp vender’s register. Copy of the entry in vendor register was obtained from Inspector General of Registration Pune.
Mazamat Ali had purchased two stamp papers in one day i.e.30 April 1985 Name of second purchaser was written later. Third falsehood is that and the date stamp affixed by the of stamp vendor is “30 April 1985” but the matter was typed and executed on “1st April 1985”. Shockingly thirty 30 days before the stamp paper was purchased which is physically not possible unless the executants travel in Time Machine backwards. The Time Machine is a science fiction novel by H.G.Wells published in 1895
In Ramrameshwari Devi v. Nirmla Devi 2011 The Supreme Court said that first step is scrutiny of the documents and pleadings. The registry in Supreme Court is not exempted from the rule of scrutiny. Why the petitioners were allowed to file altered property document and why they prayed to validate the ousted document and how this pleading could raise substantial question of Law?.
The respondent in SLP 8140 of 2017 has been robbed of his right to a fair trial. Existentialism is a philosophy concerned with finding self and the meaning of life through free will, choice, and personal responsibility. The belief is that people are searching to find out who and what they are throughout life as they make choices based on their experiences, beliefs, and outlook.
In the document the petitioners say that there was oral partnership . Profit and Loss Account was prepared balance Sheet was drawn up accepted by all and money was paid as compensation for part of land to the victim of fraud but these accounts were never enclosed to bogus retirement deed since there are no accounts at all. From 2011 till 2018 the fabricated document claiming oral pertnership is making rounds of several courts but no court ordered respondent in trial court to bring and submit accounts. The accounts are not submitted with SLP also. Shocking above everything is that the bogus document doesn’t mention survey number, name of the village, name of taluka and not even name of the district of the suit land. Sale deed is in individual names but a bogus partnership that is verbal is claimed and from that bogus partnership retirement of one joint owner is claimed Such colossal fraud before the eyes of the Honorable Judges ?
The document which is enlisted as property document is not only fabricated the fabricator had also signed as witness on the document and he was murdered on 31-12 -1992. The murder remains unsolved till the date of filing of SLP, till registry doing delay condonation and illegal listing. Summary A in murder of witness to document was filed and case was closed. Murder of witness to document has been suppressed by the petitioners in pleading in the Supreme Court. After murdering witness to bogus document the petitioners in Supreme court are about to kill the respondent in Supreme court. Can such SLP (Civil ) in which murder has taken place and suppressed by petitioner be listed by registry? What has happened to my country’s judicial system ? is the question respondent in SC has been asking. It is just Like the mafia did in Unnav recently the respondents in trial court who lost in District court and also in High Court are doing. One of them has filed summary defamation case against the victim and the magistrate issued process against the victim for harassment whenI victim is 74 year old. Base of defamation is victim’s written submission in the about murder of witness to court. Another base is victim’s application to the Superintendent of Police and one article written byline by one sanjeev Kulkarni who wrote article byline and deposed in court that he wrote because victim told him to write. Author of article is not made party newspaper is not made a party but the plaintiff in trial court who is himself a victim has been made a party. The magistrate after taking bribe ordered victim to give bail of Rs.15k . This reminds the plaintiff victim in trial court of the post-modernist novel “Trial” by Franz Kafka. In Kafka’s novel without victim committing crime or any mischief the trial goes on and finally victim is hanged. The plaintiff victim has been beaten up several times in trial court premises by opponent land mafia in Hazur sahib Nanded. After reporting assault to the Principal District judge no action was taken. The PDJ asked the assaulting advocate (who had been one accused in Bomb Blast case of 2006 ) to come to chamber and asked “Shrimanji kaya hua tha? “ Then he immediately ordered peon to arrange for tea and biscuits for the advocate who assaulted. Unnav is not alone a place where judiciary and the police are mute spectators. Nanded is another such place but it is in Maharshtra.