A big Human Rights violation goes unnoticed. A fraud is being craftily played on the Honorable Supreme Court by Hazur Sahib Nanded ‘s infamous land Mafia. Nanded is a place upto which roots of Maharshtra’s Adrash Scam and Renuka Housing Society reached. For usurping prime land in Nanded , fake property document was created by hiring a tax consultants. The scribe of fake ante –dated property document who had himself drafted fake typed it incorporating past dates of several years was murdered on new year eve 31 Dec 1992. In 2015 it’s double fake was created by removing dates and appeal was filed against Honorable court of Civil Judge Sr. Division Nanded who rejected the document as fake and inadmissible. This order of 16March 2015 was challenged by land mafia by way of writ petition No.6785 of 2015 in Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court where a double fake of property document was created by land mafia and submitted. The honorable Single Judge at Aurangabad bench dismissed the writ petition and upheld the trail Courts decision of rejecting the double fake document. The adjudication should have stopped at this level as finality was reached. But land mafia on the strength of money and muscle power orchestrated SLP filing in Honorable Supreme Court in spite of no substantial question of law raised in the petition. After rejection of fake document in Bombay High Court , FIR was filed against land mafia at Nanded for forgery on 16 Dec 2016. The members of land mafia obtained bail from District Court Nanded and reached High Court again by filing “ criminal application” under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code. This application too was rejected by Bombay High Court. The land Mafia concealed all these things which happened on criminal side of the case. Their SLP is blank on the criminal side developments. Whatis shocking is that the period the land mafia spent in criminal quashing FIR and failing in that attempt was condoned by the Registrar of the Supreme Court and notice to respondent ( plaintiff in trial court ) was also stalled. The double fake has been filed and the validation of fake document has been sought by land mafia . The murder of scribe of the fake document remains unsolved though 28 years lapsed. Now fabricators of double fake are roaming under bail obtained. Nanded police is dillydallying filing of charge sheet though more than six months have elapsed to the rejection of criminal application seeking quashing of FIR of 16 Dec 2016. Will the Honorable CJI look into the most fraudulent registering of SLP No.8140 of 2017 to be heard by the Honorable Supreme Court of India on 23 rd July 2018 ?
The legal principle behind listing and hearing of appeals is that Supreme Court registry must list only those cases as Special Leave Petitions in which a substantial question of law is raised by the petitioner which was ignored, overlooked by the High Court. In Special Leave Petition No.8140 of 2017 has been listed fraudulently by the petitioners and their lawyer with the aid of some sinner in the registry. Petitioner has filed an unregistered homemade document which is not a will and which is above the value of Rs. One hundred. Ssection 17 of The Registration Act 1908, provides that document aiming at transferring property above the value of Rs. One hundred should be compulsorily registered. (Suraj Lamps and Industries v. State of Harayana 2011 ) How can listing as SLP be done when the document is not registered ? Besides , the certified copy of the document is not filed in the Supreme Court but a doubly fake copy “cut and paste” has been filed. The crux of the false hood is that original fake, seeking transfer of property has been typed on Godrej Prima typewriter with opening sentence epstating that it is executed on 1st April 1985 on a Stamp Paper purchased on 30th April 1985. To remove discrepancy of ante-date Stamp paper Vendor’s date stamp of the stamp vendor has been erased. The document has been typed on Godrej Prima typewriter which did not exist in 1985. As per the archives “Making the Indian Typewriter :Godrej Story” the typewriter Godrej Prima was developed in 1988 and marketed widel y after 1989. Second falsehood is that the stamp paper was not purchased by one of the executants which Stamp Act prescribes but was purchased by a stranger to the case Mazamat Ali and was re- purchased by petitioners in black market. Third falsehood is that and the date stamp affixed by the stamp vendor is “ 30 April 1985” but the matter contains opening sentence which one buys on 30 April1985 that is 30 days before the purchase of stamp paper was purchased which is physically not possible unless the executants travels in Time Machine of H.G.Wells backwards Human Rights violation in the Supreme Court of India by way of fraudulent listing of SLP(Civil) No.8140 of 2017 against an ageing scholarly person to usurp his entire property has occurred
The legal principle behind listing and hearing of appeals is that Supreme Court must list only those special Leave petitions in which a substantial question of law is raised by the petitioner which was ignored by the High Court. In Special Leave Petition No.8140 of 2017 has been listed fraudulently by the petitioner and his lawyer with the aid of someone in the registry. Petitioner has filed an unregistered homemade document which is not a will and which is above the value of Rs. One hundred. According to section 17 of The Registration Act 1908 no document meant to transfer property of the value above Rs. One hundred should be compulsorily registered in sub registrar’s office (Suraj Lamps and Industries v. State of Harayana 2011 ) How can listing be done when the property document seeking validation is not registered ? Besides the certified copy of the document is not filed in Supreme Court by retyped copy has been filed . The crux of the false hood is that original document seeking transfer of property has been typed on Godrej Prima typewriter in 1985 when Godrej Prima did not exist in 1985. As per the archives “Making the Indian Typewriter :Godrej Story” the typewriter Godrej Prima was developed in 1988 and marketed widel y after 1989. Second falsehood is that the stamp paper was not purchased by one of the executants but was purchased by a stranger by name one Mazamat Ali and was re- purchased by petitioners in black market. Third falsehood is that and the date stamp affixed by the of stamp vendor is “ 30 April 1985” but the matter typed and executed on “ 1st April 1985” 30days before the stamp paper was Ramrameshwari devi v. Nirmla Devi 2011 The Supreme Court said that first step is scrutiny of the documents and pleadings. The registry in Supreme Court is not exempted from the rule of scrutiny. Why the petitioners were allowed to file altered property document and why they prayed to validate the ousted document and how this pleading could raise substantial question of Law. The respondent has resolved to die existentialism is a philosophy concerned with finding self and the meaning of life through free will, choice, and personal responsibility. The belief is that people are searching to find out who and what they are throughout life as they make choices based on their experiences, beliefs, and outlook. And personal choices become unique without the necessity of an objective form of truth. An existentialist believes that a person should be forced to choose and be responsible without the help of laws, ethnic rules, or traditions. in front of the gate of the Supreme Court and asks to cancel fraudulent listing. Fair trial is the important Human Right of every citizen
In the document the petitioners say that there was oral partnership . Profit and Loss Account was prepared balance Sheet was drawn up accepted by all but these accounts were never enclosed to bogus retirement deed from 2011 till 2018 and the accounts not submitted with SLP also. Shocking above everything is that the bogus document doesn’t mention survey number, name of the village, name of taluka and not even name of the district of the suit land. Sale deed is in individual names but a bogus partnership that is verbal is claimed and from that partnership retirement of one joint owner is claimed Such colossal fraud before the eyes of the Honorable Judges.
The document which is enlisted as property document is not only fabricated the fabricator had also signed as witness on the document and he was murdered on 31-12 -1992. The murder remains unsolved till the date of filing of SLP, delay condonation and illegal listing. Summary A under section 169 Cr.P.C. Has been filed and the murder of fabricator was closed . vails here.